In response to Toll

The last week has all been about reading and writing a brand-new conference paper which outlines my proposed approach to my research – more on that as I go.

But for today, Mathew Toll, fellow PhD candidate, and a truedude™ who keeps me on my toes, responded to the previous post I made on this blog with style and grace.

ImageHe takes note of my aimed approach and argues that my sociological starting-point “sounds a little too vanguardist, as if you should prioritize political ideals over the pursuit of an unclouded understanding.”

Good call. I feel like it definitely has to be a balance between the two – political aims and social goals, however it needs to be built on a foundation of empirical evidence and critical thinking. One without the other would render the whole work somewhat impotent to me.

Toll also gets real (i.e. academic), adding:

“The normative idea of a good sociologist I hold is someone who is motivated by a desire to understand the social and cultural formations and unravel the infinity of threads that inform our current situation. I’m not naïve enough to imagine that social scientists maintain a perfectly disinterested search for truth and aren’t, at least sub-consciously, guided by extra-scientific and normative considerations… I believe that objectivity and progression within an intellectual discipline is not achieved by individual participants crafting a view from nowhere, but a relative objectivity is achieved through mutual criticism and a desire to kick the ball forward and put together a better understanding of an object of study.”

He’s right here. Through mutual criticism/peer review, the continued push for greater social analysis, and perhaps even more importantly, the process of creating ‘public sociology’ – whereby those outside of academia can use the theories and outcomes of our research to improve their understanding of the world and their lives more generally – Toll brings out that great quest of sociology: the quest to understand the present social fabric, or “an attempt to understand the time [you] live in” (Camus, 2000, vii) ultimately for its improvement to take place.

Thanks to Mat for being as bigger nerd as I. Check out Mat’s writing at http://dostoevskiansmiles.blogspot.com.au/ and see how a real blog is done.

Keep breathing / stay well / listen to the new Fucked Up, Goodtime Boys and some Nina Simone & Rollins Band (check out Blues Jam, flip a desk: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1YvPf1yRGQM)

Alex Page – June 13, 2014.

Camus, A. (2000 [1951]) The Rebel. Penguin Books: London, UK.

Advertisements

2 comments

  1. Too nice. You should have said I was being too positivistic in my approach to sociology and that perhaps this was because I’m a white male and thus life for me is set to the lowest difficulty setting. I would have snorted in derision or written a large blog on how understanding the difficulties of race and sex is best done via solid research methods and not maligning people’s social status, but it would have been fun.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s